It’s always fun for me to discover some piece of candy history that I was never aware of before – and such was the case with Hershey’s M&M’s-like product, Hershey-ets.
Introduced sometime in the early 1950′s, it seems clear that they were intended to be a direct competitor to M&M’s. A small, candy-coated round tablet of chocolate in multiple colors. They’re still around today, at least during certain times of the year, but even so, you may have never heard of them. But I’ll get to that in a moment.
Here are the historical Hershey-ets pieces I’ve been able to bring together.
First up is a package that I believe represents the earliest style put on sale. It features a “new” call-out right on the wrapper:
I think you’ll agree that the color and type work are quite evocative of the era they were created in. I can also show you a later-run proof of this wrapper that lacks the “New” designation:

Hershey’s – Hershey-ets – candy package proof – 1950′s – Courtesy Dan Goodsell
Here’s a mint-flavored version from this same era. Though these don’t actually call themselves Hershey-ets on the wrapper, it’s pretty clear that’s what they are:

Hershey’s – Mint Chocolate Hershey-ets – candy package proof – 1950′s – Courtesy Dan Goodsell
Hershey-ets were also sold boxed in the 1950′s as you can see here:
Like so many confections through the years, Hershey sold Hershey-ets through 5-cent vending machines. I’m fortunate to have an example of a vending insert card for one:
That classic 1950′s package design would eventually see a major refresh in 1963, as indicated in this candy trade news clipping:
I’ve been hunting for one of those 1963 packs for a few years to no avail. Eventually I’ll track one down but for now I’ll share an example from a friend’s collection:

Hershey’s – Hershey-ets – candy package – mid-1960′s – Courtesy Dan Goodsell
From what I’ve found, by the 1970′s Hershey-ets were no longer being sold in standard-size candy packs. At least not here in the United States. I have tracked down a standard-sized candy box that was still being sold in Canada in the 1970′s. It’s quite a departure from what was seen in the USA, and I like it quite a lot.
As I said at the top of today’s post, Hershey-ets are still being produced, but you might not notice them unless you do a bit of baking. Here’s an example of a Hershey-ets package that you might have found in the 1970′s or 1980′s:
The other place you might recognize Hershey-ets from would be holiday tubes from Hershey. I feel like I never see them, but my good friend Cybele over at CandyBlog.net did a fantastic write up of them back in 2009. She features the current version of Hershey-ets and also does a direct comparison to current M&M’s – check it out here.

Hershey-ets Candy Cane – Image Courtesy CandyBlog.net
So, Hershey-ets started as a competitor to M&M’s and while they didn’t find long-term footing in that area, they would eventually find their own way in the world of candy.
Of course, Hershey’s haven’t thrown in the towel on the candy-coated chocolate category. Not by a long-shot. If you’ve visited a candy isle in the last few years, you’ve undoubtedly encountered Hershey’s latest answer to M&M’s; their lineup of candy-coated Pieces. Building on the success of Reese’s Pieces, they’ve now got York Peppermint Pieces, Almond Joy Pieces, and Hershey’s with Almond Pieces. But that’s an article for another day.
For now, that’s everything I have on Hershey’s original answer to M&M’s – Hershey-ets.
See you next time!









Don’t get me wrong, I love Hershey’s chocolate, but there was always something off about those Hersheyettes in the Holiday candy cane tubes. They just didn’t taste like M&Ms and were always a disappointment for me at Christmas.
I’m gonna go ahead and disagree with you on that Tom. I was the other way, when I was younger I would look forward to getting the “imitation M&M’s” in the cool crazy tubes during the holidays. And I still do. They definitely do taste different from M&M’s. In my opinion, the chocolate used by Hershey is better “in favor and flavor” than that used by Mars.
To each their own.